Writing Off the Gulf?

OBAMA APOLOGETICS. Richard Wolffe at the Daily Beast takes a guess at the reasoning behind President Obama’s response to the gulf oil spill:

Given the lack of technical capabilities on the sea floor, there’s not much the White House can do to plug the hole. And there are limited options for effectively preventing the oil from reaching large stretches of coastline. Instead, Obama’s team is focusing on the options at their immediate disposal—methods of news management and presidential communication.

Where to start? Wolffe is implying that the Administration conducted a cost-benefit analysis and then made a rational decision to write off the Gulf. Even if you could defend such a decision, there’s no evidence an analysis ever occurred. Obama has been in reaction mode since late April.

And, given the resources at the Administration’s disposal, a decision to essentially shrug and move on would be criminal. If you need boom or berms or any other material to protect the coast, get industry involved from the very start. He doesn’t need to seize companies, but at least put out a public call. Instead, he’s letting all this stuff wind its way through the bureaucracy, a single agency at a time.

And if the President is focused on “news management and presidential communication” in this case, he’s not doing a very good job of it – he lost the NY Times on this issue, even.

Via: Hot Air

Motley Fool Seeks Energy Sector Freelancer

DEMAND TO SHARE BURRITOS KILLS GREAT JOB OPPORTUNITY. I never share my burritos.

But if you do, The Motley Fool may have the perfect gig.

LA Times Positions Kagan as Ambiguous on Abortion

UM, NO.Kagan’s abortion stance has both sides guessing” says the Los Angeles Times:

…liberal activists also wonder about Kagan’s position. They point to memos she wrote as a policy staffer in the Clinton White House urging President Clinton to take a compromise position on some late-term abortions.

Kagan was just trying to prevent a true late term abortion ban from becoming law. There is nobody on either side of this issue that has any doubt whatsoever on Kagan’s position on abortion. The Times is simply cooperating with pro-abortion activists to muddy the waters and help ensure a smooth confirmation for Kagan.

AP Reaches New Height in Advocacy Reporting

“WE DON’T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED YET, BUT SURELY REGULATION WOULD HAVE PREVENTED IT”.  The Associated Press weighs in on the Gulf oil spill with “Emerging oil rig evidence shows lack of regulation“.

Emerging oil rig evidence shows lack of regulation

Prayer at Senior Citizens Center OK – Everyone Knows Except Company Running the Center

UPDATE ON SENIOR CITIZENS PRAYER BROUHAHA. Senior Citizens Inc says the no-prayer over subsidized meals directive comes from the Georgia Department of Human Services (which presumably administers federal funding for meals for the elderly within the state). Georgia DHS says there is no such regulation:

“There are no guidelines or policies set by the Division of Aging Services that would prohibit public prayer,” says James Bulot, head of the Division of Aging Services at DHS. “We serve over four million meals a year and this is the first time this has come to our attention.”

It really should have occurred to someone at Senior Citizens Inc. to pick up the phone and ask DHS for clarification before telling anyone to stop saying grace.

Seniors Incorrectly Told Not to Pray Out Loud Before Meals

WHAT OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES? There’s something missing from the widely publicized “Senior Citizens Told Not to Pray Before Meals” story.

According to the AP, the seniors have federally subsidized meals at a senior citizens center near Savannah, Georgia. The company providing the meals, Senior Citizens, Inc., claims that seniors who pray out loud before meals are violating federal rules.  The company requested that the seniors stop praying out loud and have a moment of silence instead:

Tim Rutherford, Senior Citizens Inc. vice president, said some of his staff recently visited the center and noticed people praying shortly before lunch was served. Rutherford said his company provides meals like baked chicken, steak tips and rice and salads at a cost of about $6 a plate. Seniors taking the meals pay 55 cents and federal money foots the rest of the bill, Rutherford said.

“We can’t scoff at their rules,” he said of federal authorities. “It’s a part of the operational guidelines.”

What exactly are the guidelines Rutherford is referring to?  The AP doesn’t say.  Assume the funding comes from Health and Human Services. From a quick search, there is nothing on hhs.gov that indicates individual prayer before federally subsidized meals is prohibited.  I can’t find anything directly related to the elderly, but here are examples from other programs:

  • “For example, a parent can use a CCDF certificate/voucher to pay for child care services provided in a church facility, even when part of the child care program includes worship or religious instruction.” (source).
  • “This doesn’t mean the organization cannot have religious activities. However, they cannot use taxpayer dollars to fund them.” (source)

Also, the State of Wyoming looked at the exact same question and reached the opposite conclusion.

“Organizations that receive direct financial assistance…may not engage in inherently religious activities…it is advised that the Senior Center not restrict personal prayer in any manner (e.g. a participant praying silently or audibly at a congregate meal site if the program participant so chooses), but refrain from an organized/led prayer.

There is a huge difference between “can’t pray out loud” and “can’t use taxpayer dollars to fund prayer”.  I suspect Senior Citizens, Inc. has an overly zealous employee, and just didn’t do their homework before telling the seniors they couldn’t pray out loud.  Not a good call for a company in their business.

Kathryn Lopez Interviews Sister Mary Prudence Allen

SISTER MARY PRUDENCE ALLEN, DIRECT AND TO THE POINT. Kathryn Jean Lopez conducts a marvelous interview in which Sr. Prudence talks about topics ranging from what a normal day is like for a sister – disciplined and devoted, as you might expect, with about 3-4 hours of prayer daily – to the health care bill to the to the scandal in the church.

Sr. Prudence is unequivocal and articulate, gently skewering solutions to the latter that she perceives as poorly thought out. Her response to the suggestion that the Pope might resign is priceless:

LOPEZ: In case you haven’t been watching MSNBC, as I have, you should know that the pope may resign and that he is akin to Richard Nixon, caught in crimes and cover-up. Aren’t you ashamed at all to be a part of an institution that has such a scandal-rich contemporary history, which it still hasn’t cleaned house over?

SISTER PRUDENCE: The statement in the first sentence reveals such a lack of knowledge and understanding of the Church and of our present Pope that it does not merit a response. The Church is not just another human institution, but one instituted by Jesus Christ.

Although off the mark, the second question is more approachable. You ask about shame and being ashamed to be a part of an institution. An analogy might be useful here. Consider other kinds of institution, such as we find in sports, academia, businesses, etc. If one person in that institution is accused of doing something wrong — an athlete, say, or a university president, or a businessman — should that imply shame on the part of all who participate in the sport, study at the university, or invest in the business? Rather, it would likely evoke the passion of sorrow for the one who has strayed and for the people who have been wounded by his or her straying. A further analogy can be drawn from these examples. Should a sport, university, or business be judged on the basis of one of its members who does something poorly or wrong? Shouldn’t we rather try to judge the sport, university, or business by the best examples associated with it? Thus, shouldn’t the Church be evaluated more by its saints, such as Mother Teresa, and the many others who through it have done so many works of charity through the years?

In another question, Lopez refers to “one prominent reporter” who simply declares that the Church needs more women. I think I know who she’s talking about.

Sister Prudence also has some insight and advice applicable to those of us, left and right, who tend to get all caught up in politics:

…the mind receives according to the mode of the receiver. If the mode of the receiver is a political feminist ideology, then that is how he or she will perceive the Catholic Church…[later] If you are seeking to understand and report the truth about something, you should read the original sources, interview trusted people, ponder what you find, develop a hypothesis, test it out, and reformulate it. Always seek greater accuracy, and always maintain gentleness (truth persuades by its own gentle power) and love for the good reputation of everyone.

Nicole Gelinas on the Financial Stability Oversight Council

EXACTLY. Nicole Gelinas of the Manhattan Institute hits the nail on the head about the proposed financial reform bill:

Dodd’s bill, for example, creates new regulatory authorities, such as a Financial Stability Oversight Council…The FSOC likely would have declared AAA-rated mortgage securities safe as houses at the peak of the real estate bubble, just like almost everyone else.

Also, she has good advice for the GOP, and I hope McConnell et al take it.

Exceptionalism and the Texas State Board of Education

WHAT THE ANGST IS ALL ABOUT. With one short quote, a University of Texas professor epitomizes opposition to the Texas State Board of Education’s proposed social studies curriculum changes. From the San Antonio Express News:

Maggie Rivas-Rodriguez, an associate professor at the University of Texas at Austin Center for Mexican American studies, believes the proposed standards varnish history and said she wouldn’t want her own two children exposed to some of the teachings, such as “American exceptionalism.”

“Why do we want our children to believe that the United States is any better than any other country?” she asked. “There is no country on this Earth that doesn’t have some skeletons in their closet.”

Dr. Rivas-Rodriguez is an Associate Professor of Journalism at the University of Texas.

FDA Plans Salt Limitations

WHY STOP THERE? FDA Plans to limit amount of salt allowed in foods for health reasons.

Brits vs Irish, the REAL Conflict

WHO’S THE DRUNKEST OF THEM ALL? Ireland and Britain both claim the EU Binge Drinking title.  Reminds me of an exhortation years ago from one of my Accounting professors:  “You’ll be surprised to hear that Texas is number two in the nation in drunk driving per capita.  So get out there and make us number one!”

Can Political Journalists Cover Financial Reform?

AND DO LEGISLATORS UNDERSTAND IT WELL ENOUGH TO VOTE ON IT? David Adesnik wonders if political journalists understand the financial reform bill well enough to cover it.

A Dozen Agencies Wandering Around Doing Their Own Thing

Obama Inspects the GulfIf you’re a hammer, everything looks like a nail.  If you’re an attorney, you do what President Obama has done to respond the gulf oil spill, namely, initiate legal proceedings and send BP an invoice for $69 MM.

If you’re also a politician, you might do the other things Obama has done, like:

  • Establish a commission
  • Thrown the whole alphabet of federal agencies at the problem
  • Ban new offshore drilling
  • Reverse yourself and allow some new drilling
  • Reverse yourself again and stop new drilling in response to pressure from your base

Obama is responding like someone with no experience in strategic operations and execution, surrounded by people who don’t have any experience, either.  And that’s exactly where things are going wrong.

more>>

USA Today Tax Article Provides Opportunity to Indulge New Hobby of Checking Stories for Accuracy

USA Today Runs Story on Lower Tax Payments, Doesn’t Mention Unemployment

I validated the data in this USA Today story about how wonderful it is that tax rates are so low. The article can be summed up with this quote:

“Some conservative political movements such as the “Tea Party” have criticized federal spending as being out of control. While spending is up, taxes have fallen to exceptionally low levels…Federal, state and local taxes — including income, property, sales and other taxes — consumed 9.2% of all personal income in 2009, the lowest rate since 1950…”

You can check it out, too. USAToday draws at least some of its numbers from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, or BEA. They don’t provide a link, but from the article I believe they are looking at the NIPA (National Income and Products Account) tables, specifically the Personal Income and Its Disposition one.

more>>

Palin Visits Austin; Media Confuses Hostility with Objectivity, Accuracy

Just Over Half of Rick Perry Introduces Sarah Palin in Austin

Sarah Palin spoke in Austin last Thursday, and I was in the audience. Her appearance was at a benefit for Heroic Media, a pro-life organization which produces ads aimed at young women who are unexpectedly pregnant.

I watched Palin’s original introductory speech when John McCain introduced her as his running mate, and, after reading up on her history, have supported her since. So, if you are looking for an unbiased opinion, this is not it. After reading some of the local media outlet reports, though, I’m compelled to note that “active hostility” doesn’t qualify as objectivity either. (More on that here).

Texas governor Rick Perry also spoke at the event,

more>>

Local Media Coverage of Palin’s Austin Appearance

When Sarah Palin spoke in Austin last week, media passes were not granted for the event.  So in order to cover the speech, reporters – or the companies they work for – had to shell out $50 to attend.  There was some  outrage on the net about this, not so much for the cost but [...]

more>>

NY Times Advocates Paying Workers Less, Capitalist Overlords More

The New York Times published an interesting but somewhat confusing article about bankers’ compensation recently.  From the article:
“Goldman Sachs, that highest of highfliers, is doing the unthinkable. It is giving its employees an unusually small cut of its profits — about 45 cents out of every dollar — even though its paydays will, in dollar [...]

more>>